ADA Monitor

Trust

Accessibility statement.

An accessibility company's website should hold itself to the standard it sells. Here is ours — including the parts that aren't finished.

last reviewed: july 2026

Our commitment

This website is designed and built to conform with WCAG 2.2 level AA. Accessibility considerations shaped it from the first line of CSS, not as a retrofit.

What this site does

  • Semantic landmarks, one h1 per page, and a logical heading order.
  • A visible "skip to content" link and full keyboard operability, with persistent, high-visibility focus indicators.
  • Color is never the only signal — every status chip pairs color with text.
  • Text and interface color pairs are chosen to meet at least 4.5:1 contrast for normal text.
  • All animation is decorative and additive: content is complete and readable with JavaScript disabled, and all motion — including the homepage scanning demonstration and the moving ticker — is disabled when your system asks for reduced motion.
  • Product mock-ups are hidden from assistive technology and paired with text descriptions.
  • Forms have visible labels, described errors, and no time limits.
  • Touch targets meet a 44-pixel minimum; body text never renders below 16 pixels.
  • Content reflows for small screens and 200% zoom without horizontal scrolling.

Known limitations

  • The scrolling ticker on the homepage moves by default; it pauses on hover and focus, and does not move at all under reduced-motion settings. If you find it disruptive despite that, tell us.
  • This statement reflects internal review. An external audit of this site has not yet been performed; we'll update this page when one is.

Feedback

If any part of this site is hard to use with your assistive technology, we want to know and we will fix it. Reach us through the contact form — accessibility feedback gets routed directly to the team that builds this site.

How we talk about results

Accessibility software has an overclaiming problem — in 2025 the FTC finalized a $1M order against a vendor over claims that an automated product could make any website WCAG-compliant. So we hold our own marketing to written rules:

  • No compliance guarantees. We will never claim to make your store "ADA compliant," "lawsuit-proof," or "100% WCAG conformant." No automated tool can truthfully claim that.
  • Targets are labeled as targets. Our "~80% of eligible issues" figure is a product target across supported fix categories — not a measured average customer outcome. When we have representative production benchmarks, we'll publish them with their methodology.
  • Statistics carry their sources and scope. Market figures on this site cite their study, sample, and date, with limitations stated next to the number — not in a footnote.
  • No real customer data is shown. Product interface examples on this site are constructed for explanation and do not depict any merchant's store.
  • No invented social proof. You'll find no fabricated testimonials, logos, or review counts here. When we publish customer results, they'll be real and attributed.

Automated testing can identify many important barriers, but it cannot determine complete WCAG conformance or replace qualified human review and usability testing with disabled people. ADA Monitor supports ongoing accessibility monitoring, remediation, verification, and evidence — it is not a certification or a legal determination.